Yearly Archives: 2007

The church does not pay taxes on buildings in Italy and EU gives us a fine.

In Italy the Church is way too powerful. The last news is that European Union has opened an investigation for alleged violation of concurrency. (news in Italian from Repubblica.it).
Why? The Berlusconi government in 2005 created a law by which the Italian Church didn’t have to pay the tax on buildings property (ICI). Considering that the Church owns almost 25% of buildings in Italy, this means the Church steals to Italy 400 millions of Euro per year (per year!). Now nothing would have happen in this country whose politicians are prostrated on knees to the Vatican and independent journalism does not exist but the European Union started the investigation because the Italian Church in this way is advantaged by the state in the concurrency with normal shops, yes the church has cinemas, shops, holidays places, restaurants, etc. Now we might even get a huge fee for being so church-friendly, great eh? The article says that Italy is basically a fiscal paradise for the Church so, really, why do you need a paradise for the souls when you can have Italy who is a paradise for your money? I’m really upset, 400 million Euros per year!

The future as seen by Casaleggio

Very interesting video from Casaleggio Associati about the future. Casaleggio is a consultancy company that develops network strategies from Italy, but maybe you could spot this from the accent.
Just one quote: “Virtual life is the biggest market on the planet. Prometeus finances all the space missions to find new worlds for its customers: the terrestrial avatar.
Experience is the new reality.”
Check the video.

Question for myself: creating such a video is now possible for everyone but still takes a lot of time, so why a company would do it precisely? To show potential customers that they get it? To get some buzz and links? Just for fun? I guess the first one is prominent but maybe there is a mix of these. I do hope Casaleggio becomes the consultants of Italian Government for strategies for future, this would shake a bit the atmosphere here in Italy and would show that politicians have a vision that goes beyond 6 months, which currently does not seem the case.

Links for 2007 06 22

Links for 2007 06 20

Campaign for the Liberalization of the sector of Software for Personal Computer

LiberaSW Banner
There is a worthy campaign in Italy for the Liberalization of the sector of Software for Personal Computer. You can sign the petition (in Italian).
The campaign LiberaSW (Il computer è mio e lo gestisco io) asks a national law containing (in a nutshell) the following points:
1) When a personal computer is sold, the price of the hardware must be stated explicitly as an independent value and it must not be incorporated with the price for the license of the (possibly present) software.
2) The buyer must be able to refuse to pay the price for the software license and pay just the price of the hardware.
3) The price of the software license must be realistic.

Is there such a law in your country? If not, maybe you could start a similar campaign for your country.

“The Implications of OpenID” presentation

Simon does a great job in explaining what is OpenID, what problems does it solve, what can you do with an OpenID and providing answers to a lot of other questions you wanted to know and never dared to ask about.
The presentation is composed by 178 extremely clear and informative slides, pure gold really!

A very important slide is #109: “Why is OpenID worth implementing over all the other identity standards?” Answer:

  • It’s simple
  • Unix philosophy: It solves one, tiny problem
  • It’s a dumb network
  • Many of the competing standards are now on board

Check OpenID, it is really simple, that’s why I think it will work. Making gnuband.org an OpenID URL took 3 minutes, now I can login in sites using gnuband.org as OpenID: no more need to remember a nick/password pair for every site and no more risk someone “steals” your preferred nickname.

Links for 2007 06 09

Reputation is in the eye of the beholder: on subjectivity and objectivity of trust statements

I eventually managed to get invited to the ENISA Workshop “Security Issues in Reputation Systems” and at the eema’s “The European e-identity conference”. So I’ll be in Paris from Monday 11 until Wednesday 13, of course hosted by friendly Couchsurfers. The program is quite interesting, I’m especially looking forward for the keynote address by Kim Cameron, whose blog I’ve been reading since some time, and a presentation by Alessandro Acquisti of CMU titled “Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing and privacy: the Facebook case”
Let me know if you’ll be there, I’ll be happy to discuss about trust, reputation, identity, whatever.
Since I was required to provide a position paper, I put up the following, the intention was to be a little provocative but I don’t know if it was successful. If you read it, let me know what you think about it. The position paper “Reputation is in the eye of the beholder: on subjectivity and objectivity of trust statements” can be read after the jump (i.e. click on “more” if present).

Continue reading

An online game is like a country and citizens asks for democracy

Interesting article on nytimes. I particularly liked this part:

“Perception is reality, and if a substantial part of our community feels like we are biased, whether it is true or not, it is true to them,” Hilmar Petursson, CCP’s chief executive, said in a telephone interview. “Eve Online is not a computer game. It is an emerging nation, and we have to address it like a nation being accused of corruption.”

Also relevant this washingtonpost article Does Virtual Reality Need a Sheriff? Reach of Law Enforcement Is Tested When Online Fantasy Games Turn Sordid:

Rosedale said he hopes participants in Second Life eventually develop their own virtual legal code and justice system. “In the ideal case, the people who are in Second Life should think of themselves as citizens of this new place and not citizens of their countries,” he said.

Note that he is speaking about citizens developing legal code and not world-creators embedding a legal code into the programming code. Interesting times …

Below the beginning of the article from nytimes
Continue reading